Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Sun Nov 26 2000 - 11:58:50 EST

Next message: Elmer Joandi: "Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0""
Previous message: Tim Waugh: "Re: Linux 2.4.0test11ac4"
In reply to: Olaf Dietsche: "Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy"
Next in thread: Mike Castle: "Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 26 Nov 2000, Olaf Dietsche wrote:

> A simple `gcc -march=i686' or `gcc -mpentiumpro' does fix it as
> well. So, if you configure your kernel with `CONFIG_M686=y' the
> problem should be gone.

Except for the fact that it'll no longer boot on Pentiums
and 486es ;)

Rik

-- Hollywood goes for world dumbination, Trailer at 11.

http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Elmer Joandi: "Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0""
Previous message: Tim Waugh: "Re: Linux 2.4.0test11ac4"
In reply to: Olaf Dietsche: "Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy"
Next in thread: Mike Castle: "Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 21:00:15 EST