Re: Linux 2.4.0test11ac4

From: Tim Waugh (twaugh@redhat.com)
Date: Sun Nov 26 2000 - 11:40:58 EST

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy"
Previous message: Tim Waugh: "Re: 2.4.0-test11(-ac4)/i386 configure bug"
In reply to: John Cavan: "Re: Linux 2.4.0test11ac4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 05:36:58PM -0500, John Cavan wrote:

> Just so I understand the differences, for learning purposes... Tim
> did this a little different than I did and I'd just like to
> understand the "whys" of it.

It's Douglas Gilbert's modified patch; Douglas explained that he
didn't find that dropping the io_request_lock for just
parport_enumerate was enough during his testing.

Tim.
*/

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy"
Previous message: Tim Waugh: "Re: 2.4.0-test11(-ac4)/i386 configure bug"
In reply to: John Cavan: "Re: Linux 2.4.0test11ac4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 21:00:15 EST