Re: crash @ 64 day's of uptime

From: Paul Jakma (paul@clubi.ie)
Date: Fri Nov 10 2000 - 20:32:08 EST

Next message: Keith Owens: "Re: Where is it written?"
Previous message: David Weinehall: "Re: 2.2.17 wont compile on AMD k6@-550"
In reply to: Robbert Muller: "crash @ 64 day's of uptime"
Next in thread: willy tarreau: "Re: crash @ 64 day's of uptime"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Robbert Muller wrote:

> Hi

> some inspections of old log's on 2 other machines at home which both recently
> crashed. Both up , you already guest it, 64 day's.

[paulj@berkman paulj]$ uptime
1:25am up 202 days, 6:44, 12 users, load average: 0.75, 0.29, 0.20
[paulj@berkman paulj]$ rpm -q redhat-release
redhat-release-6.2-1

you don't have a cleaner coming in every 64 days do you? :)

groetjes,

-- Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt ------------------------------------------- Fortune: Never ask two questions in a business letter. The reply will discuss the one you are least interested, and say nothing about the other.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Keith Owens: "Re: Where is it written?"
Previous message: David Weinehall: "Re: 2.2.17 wont compile on AMD k6@-550"
In reply to: Robbert Muller: "crash @ 64 day's of uptime"
Next in thread: willy tarreau: "Re: crash @ 64 day's of uptime"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST