Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI)

From: Martin Dalecki (dalecki@evision-ventures.com)
Date: Fri Nov 10 2000 - 06:42:54 EST


Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> On 9 Nov 2000, Mike Coleman wrote:
>
> > Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> writes:
> > > <shrug> RMS had repeatedly demonstrated what he's worth as a designer
> > > and programmer. Way below zero. You may like or dislike his ideology,
> > > but when it comes to technical stuff... Not funny.
> >
> > Huh?
> >
> > <annoying valspeak tone>
> >
> > *Hello*? GNU gcc? GNU emacs? Way below zero? *Hello*?!?
> >
> > </annoying valspeak tone>
>
> Yes. GNU emacs. Bloated and ugly like hell. gcc. Codebase is anything but
> pretty. Your point being? And no, it's not trolling. RMS really got no
> taste - read his postings on _technical_ GNU lists and see yourself.

Actually emacs is complete crap int terms of both ergonomy and coding.
But the current gcc code base doesn't contain much from RMS anylonger.
The "beauty" of lisp coded in C it is...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 15 2000 - 21:00:16 EST