On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> It's not the only problem, but I would feel _much_ safer if pagefault
> wouldn't rely on pagecache miss. Actually... Hey. Why don't we do the
> insertion into page tables _within_ ->nopage()?
NO!
We used to do this a LOONG time ago.
Distributing the VM information on how to properly insert a pte into the
page table into drivers is _NOT_ something I want to do again. It was a
pain to get it properly modularized, we're not going back to the horror.
Note that if there really are only 9 "nopage" routines, then it is a lot
easier to just add the single "SetPageUptodate(page)" into those 9
routines, and thus let the VM know of the race.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 21:00:13 EST