Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM

• Next message: Gerhard Mack: "RE [OT] Reply to headder.."
• Previous message: safemode: "Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
• In reply to: safemode: "Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
• Next in thread: David Ford: "Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

safemode wrote:

> SHM segments are increasing (they only go away when X closes) .. swap seems
> to be stable for now here is the ipcs -u output

If they all go away when X closes, it seems that X is at fault.

-d

--
"The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an
eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was
'committed'."

• text/x-vcard attachment: Card for David Ford

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Gerhard Mack: "RE [OT] Reply to headder.."
• Previous message: safemode: "Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
• In reply to: safemode: "Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
• Next in thread: David Ford: "Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 21:00:29 EST