Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO

From: Andi Kleen (ak@muc.de)
Date: Mon Sep 18 2000 - 13:22:36 EST

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint"
Previous message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: [RFC] Wine speedup through kernel module"
In reply to: Julian Anastasov: "Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO"
Next in thread: Julian Anastasov: "Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO"
Reply: Julian Anastasov: "Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 08:04:21PM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Everything looks good after test1 except the extra
> '<< 16' in __SI_CODE.
>
> SI_SIGIO is not generated from kernel. The same is for the
> other SI_ consts < 0 not defined with __SI_CODE.

Ok, then you have already broken binary compatibility between 2.2 and 2.4

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint"
Previous message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: [RFC] Wine speedup through kernel module"
In reply to: Julian Anastasov: "Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO"
Next in thread: Julian Anastasov: "Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO"
Reply: Julian Anastasov: "Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 21:00:19 EST