Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO

From: Julian Anastasov (ja@ssi.bg)
Date: Mon Sep 18 2000 - 16:01:54 EST

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: An elevator algorithm (patch)"
Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: NFS locking bug -- limited mtime resolution means nfs_lock() does not provide coherency guarantee"
Maybe in reply to: Andi Kleen: "[PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO"
Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

Everything looks good after test1 except the extra
'<< 16' in __SI_CODE.

SI_SIGIO is not generated from kernel. The same is for the
other SI_ consts < 0 not defined with __SI_CODE.

We don't need to mention how broken is 2.2

Regards

-- Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: An elevator algorithm (patch)"
Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: NFS locking bug -- limited mtime resolution means nfs_lock() does not provide coherency guarantee"
Maybe in reply to: Andi Kleen: "[PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO"
Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 21:00:18 EST