Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

From: Timur Tabi (
Date: Thu Aug 31 2000 - 10:29:51 EST

** Reply to message from Daniel Phillips
<> on Thu, 31 Aug 2000 16:48:59

> > As for the argument of putting it in the kernel being more robust and
> > idiot-proof, well, if someone can't keep three files and one directory
> > straight for each different configuration of the kernel that they want to
> > play with, they probably shouldn't be configuring and compiling kernels in
> > the first place. You can't idiot-proof the world, and even if you could, some
> > things really shouldn't be.
> I for one can't even keep two files straight - my kernel is forever
> getting out of synch with my Of course, I may be the only
> person that has ever had this happen to them. ;-) I am all for
> idiot-proofing things where you can, especially when the idiot is me.

No, it's not just you. I think it's a common problem, and I think
/proc/config.gz would help a lot.

Timur Tabi -
Interactive Silicon -

When replying to a mailing-list message, please don't cc: me, because then I'll just get two copies of the same message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 21:00:27 EST