Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

From: Timur Tabi (
Date: Thu Aug 31 2000 - 10:27:53 EST

** Reply to message from Nathan Paul Simons <> on Thu, 31
Aug 2000 07:24:28 -0600

> i agree with Alan, and for more than just the above reason. One of
> the rules of thumb where i work is "keep that sh*t out of our kernel!". i
> don't see what the problem is with just putting the config file in a common
> place and adding an extension to the end of it, ie
> /boot/config-2.4.0-test1-dbg.

That's why /proc/config.gz should be an option. People who want it, like
myself, can include it. People who don't, like you, can omit.

Why can't we have our cake AND eat it too?

Timur Tabi -
Interactive Silicon -

When replying to a mailing-list message, please don't cc: me, because then I'll just get two copies of the same message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 21:00:27 EST