Re: [patch-2.4.0-test8-pre1] buglet in sk_init().

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Aug 30 2000 - 10:50:53 EST

Next message: Martin Diehl: "Re: Hmm.. "notify_parent()"."
Previous message: Simon Richter: "Re: If loadable modules are covered by Linux GPL?"
In reply to: Matthias Hanisch: "Re: [patch-2.4.0-test8-pre1] buglet in sk_init()."
Next in thread: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: [patch-2.4.0-test8-pre1] buglet in sk_init()."
Reply: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: [patch-2.4.0-test8-pre1] buglet in sk_init()."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Wouldn't it be better if we move the null pointer test and the panic()
> inside kmem_cache_create() similar to this

Most kmem_cache_creates should not be fatal. I question the socket one
in some ways
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin Diehl: "Re: Hmm.. "notify_parent()"."
Previous message: Simon Richter: "Re: If loadable modules are covered by Linux GPL?"
In reply to: Matthias Hanisch: "Re: [patch-2.4.0-test8-pre1] buglet in sk_init()."
Next in thread: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: [patch-2.4.0-test8-pre1] buglet in sk_init()."
Reply: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: [patch-2.4.0-test8-pre1] buglet in sk_init()."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 21:00:25 EST