On 8/10/00, 4:14:43 PM, Martin Dalecki <m.dalecki@stock-world.de> wrote
regarding Re: Definitions:
[add reiserfs into the kernel?]
> Please DON'T have this accident! There are JFS and XFS on the way - both
> are
> more proven in the real world and there is a *much* higher wight behind
> them.
> It is better to wait a bit and let them
> compete with each other for becoming the *de facto* next linux standard
> filesystem then to let RaiserFS play this role by accident of beeing
> first... (QUOTAS - where are you there?). I think both of them are
> a much much better design and what is more important they are much much
> more tested (in terms of design) in the wild then RaiserFS.
Shrug. Each FS has features the others don't, and it doesn't make much
sense to limit our options because some day soon someone else might be
kind enough to make their well known FS stable in linux, and get it
accepted into the kernel. Both XFS and JFS have good teams of
developers, and the end result is that all the linux filesystems are
going to benefit from the competition.
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:22 EST