From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@w...>
Date: Wed Aug 9, 2000 10:18pm
Subject: Re: Definitions
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 08:28:40PM +0100, Adam Sampson
wrote:
> Please could you have another "accident" and add
reiserfs, then?
as i understand it, reiserfs (just like all journalling
filesystems)
requires changes to the core kernel code which are
unacceptable at
this point. but my understanding may be flawed.
Please DON'T have this accident! There are JFS and XFS on the way - both
are
more proven in the real world and there is a *much* higher wight behind
them.
It is better to wait a bit and let them
compete with each other for becoming the *de facto* next linux standard
filesystem then to let RaiserFS play this role by accident of beeing
first... (QUOTAS - where are you there?). I think both of them are
a much much better design and what is more important they are much much
more tested (in terms of design) in the wild then RaiserFS.
--
- languages: de_DE, en_US, pl_PL, last ressort: ru_RU.KOI8-R
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:00:22 EST