Re: [off-topic] BP6/HPT-366 problems? [Was: Dual athlon support?]

From: Andre Hedrick (andre@linux-ide.org)
Date: Thu Aug 03 2000 - 13:00:44 EST

Next message: Chris Meadors: "Re: [OOPS] getting a bit farther tracking it."
Previous message: Benjamin C.R. LaHaise: "Re: RFC: design for new VM"
In reply to: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: [off-topic] BP6/HPT-366 problems? [Was: Dual athlon support?]"
Next in thread: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: [off-topic] BP6/HPT-366 problems? [Was: Dual athlon support?]"
Reply: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: [off-topic] BP6/HPT-366 problems? [Was: Dual athlon support?]"
Reply: Dan Hollis: "Re: [off-topic] BP6/HPT-366 problems? [Was: Dual athlon support?]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Gregory Maxwell wrote:

> 6. Don't use the HPT66 controler.

This was the past and not the present.

Andre Hedrick
The Linux ATA/IDE guy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Chris Meadors: "Re: [OOPS] getting a bit farther tracking it."
Previous message: Benjamin C.R. LaHaise: "Re: RFC: design for new VM"
In reply to: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: [off-topic] BP6/HPT-366 problems? [Was: Dual athlon support?]"
Next in thread: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: [off-topic] BP6/HPT-366 problems? [Was: Dual athlon support?]"
Reply: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: [off-topic] BP6/HPT-366 problems? [Was: Dual athlon support?]"
Reply: Dan Hollis: "Re: [off-topic] BP6/HPT-366 problems? [Was: Dual athlon support?]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 07 2000 - 21:00:11 EST