On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, I Lee Hetherington wrote:
> Jes Sorensen wrote:
>
> > Thats totally irrelevant, gcc-2.95.2 whether it's considered a release
> > or not is unable to compile the 2.2.x kernels - well known issue that
> > will not get fixed. One should not do that it's as simple as that.
>
> I have been compiling 2.2 with gcc 2.95 for nearly a year now without any
> kernel-related problems. Shame on me.
>
ditto..what parallel universe is HE in?
[admin@athena admin]$ gcc -v ; uname -r
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnulibc1/2.95.2/specs
gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
2.2.15pre18
-Cygnus
.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer
thelittleprince@asteroid-b612.org Intergrafix Internet Services
"Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today"
http://www.asteroid-b612.org http://www.intergrafix.net
.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 07 2000 - 21:00:06 EST