Re: [PATCH] Decrease hash table memory overhead

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Sat Jul 29 2000 - 01:08:24 EST

Next message: Rahul Shrivastava: "How does the kernel maintains the cwd for the processes ??"
Previous message: Andre Hedrick: "Castlewood Systems ORBS and 2.4.0"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Decrease hash table memory overhead"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Decrease hash table memory overhead"
Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Decrease hash table memory overhead"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 29 Jul 2000, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> I haven't tried too hard, but I'm sure that I could do a benchmark that
> shows the speed difference by the cache usage of the single pointer list
> and the double pointer list for a big table.

Hey, feel free. That might motivate me if it is noticeable.

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rahul Shrivastava: "How does the kernel maintains the cwd for the processes ??"
Previous message: Andre Hedrick: "Castlewood Systems ORBS and 2.4.0"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Decrease hash table memory overhead"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Decrease hash table memory overhead"
Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Decrease hash table memory overhead"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:29 EST