Re: Bug In ide-probe.c in 2.2.10 and +

From: Mike Panetta (mpanetta@applianceware.com)
Date: Mon Jun 19 2000 - 13:53:37 EST

Next message: Alexei I. Adamovich: "Re: knfsd and ext2? Huh?"
Previous message: Florian Lohoff: "Re: [2.4.0-test1-ac21] ACPI ThinkPad 390E no poweroff"
In reply to: Brian Martin: "Re: Bug In ide-probe.c in 2.2.10 and +"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Bug In ide-probe.c in 2.2.10 and +"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This is strange... I dont have a problem with this on
kernel 2.2.14...

On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 01:23:36PM -0500, Brian Martin wrote:
>
>
> From: "Isabelle, Francois" <Isabellf@Teknor.com>
> > In the following, it is assumed that no mate is present on a
> > interface where
> > a sandisk resides, this is not always true. I cannot send a patch
> > at this
> > time...
>
> If somebody could patch this, it would really be great. My folks are
> antsy for me to "fix" the computer, and my C skills are awful...
>
> --
> Brian Martin

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alexei I. Adamovich: "Re: knfsd and ext2? Huh?"
Previous message: Florian Lohoff: "Re: [2.4.0-test1-ac21] ACPI ThinkPad 390E no poweroff"
In reply to: Brian Martin: "Re: Bug In ide-probe.c in 2.2.10 and +"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: Bug In ide-probe.c in 2.2.10 and +"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 21:00:17 EST