Re: spin_lock_irq vs. spin_lock_irqsave.

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Sat Jun 17 2000 - 10:07:28 EST


Andrew Morton writes:
> Basically, you should use the irqsave version if there's any chance that
> an interrupt routine could claim the same lock. This is because the
> current CPU could get interrupted, try to grab the lock and would
> deadlock.

Not exactly what Daniel was asking, but yes, if in doubt, use the _irqsave
variant. If you can guarantee that interrupts are always enabled, and
you need to protect against interrupts, use the _irq variant.
   _____
  |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
  | | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- ---
  | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/aboutme.html / / |
  | +-+-+ --- -+-
  / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
 / | | | --- |
    +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 21:00:14 EST