Re: It's time to get rid of zImage

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
Date: Fri Jun 16 2000 - 18:24:25 EST


Followup to: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1000616151135.13082A-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
By author: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> `make boot' is the architecture-independent way of making a bootable
> image. It builds whatever is appropriate for booting on a given
> architecture, be it zImage, vmlinux.gz, vmlinux.ecoff or anything.
> Instructions about `make zImage' are a leftover from i386-only days. Ever
> tried `make zImage' on an Alpha?...
>

Indeed... there is also "make install" -- which is better than "make
zlilo" even on i386 (since it runs /sbin/installkernel which is
distribution-dependent)... yet far too much docs still mention "make
zlilo" and friends.

        -hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 21:00:13 EST