Re: fs.h in sound.h?

• Next message: Matt Yourst: "2.3.99-pre7: intermittent PCMCIA crashes on loading yenta.o"
• Previous message: Rui Sousa: "[PATCH] pci devices initialization."
• Maybe in reply to: Erik Mouw: "fs.h in sound.h?"
• Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: fs.h in sound.h?"
• Reply: Russell King: "Re: fs.h in sound.h?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

kernel@kvack.org wrote on 12.5.00 23:42:

>On Fri, 12 May -1, Erik Mouw
>wrote:
>
>> Agreed, it needs a major
>cleanup, but let's leave it to
>linux-2.5. In the
>> mean time, I think we can
>safely apply the following
>patch:
>
>WHAT ARE YOU DOING????!!!

Shouting in an email message is not considered polite. Consult a FAQ about netiquette on this issue.

> struct file_operations;
>
>is all that's needed. Geez.

Thank's for your input. If you read my message, you would have seen my argument for including linux/fs.h in linux/sound.h.

The only files that include linux/sound.h are sound drivers. Those sound drivers have to register themselves with the soundcore, and for that they need a struct file_operations. Therefore it's safe to include.

Erik

--
J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw
email: j.a.k.mouw.its.tudelft.nl
www: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Matt Yourst: "2.3.99-pre7: intermittent PCMCIA crashes on loading yenta.o"
• Previous message: Rui Sousa: "[PATCH] pci devices initialization."
• Maybe in reply to: Erik Mouw: "fs.h in sound.h?"
• Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: fs.h in sound.h?"
• Reply: Russell King: "Re: fs.h in sound.h?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 15 2000 - 21:00:22 EST