Re: fs.h in sound.h?

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Fri May 12 2000 - 14:48:13 EST


kernel@kvack.org writes:
> On Fri, 12 May -1, Erik Mouw wrote:
> > Agreed, it needs a major cleanup, but let's leave it to linux-2.5. In the
> > mean time, I think we can safely apply the following patch:
>
> WHAT ARE YOU DOING????!!!
>
> struct file_operations;
>
> is all that's needed. Geez.

Quite. Why say "we can leave the cleanup until 2.5, but why not make the
situation worse anyway" when its easier to say "we can fix this and not make
things worse than they already are".

Thanks whoever you are.
   _____
  |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
  | | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- ---
  | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/aboutme.html / / |
  | +-+-+ --- -+-
  / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
 / | | | --- |
    +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 15 2000 - 21:00:21 EST