Re: [patch] balanced highmem subsystem under pre7-9

• Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH] int (*readpage)(struct file *, struct page *);"
• Previous message: Christoph Rohland: "Re: [patch] balanced highmem subsystem under pre7-9"
• In reply to: Christoph Rohland: "Re: [patch] balanced highmem subsystem under pre7-9"
• Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [patch] balanced highmem subsystem under pre7-9"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 12 May 2000, Christoph Rohland wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
>
> Your patch breaks my tests again (Which run fine for some time now on
> pre7):
>
> 11 1 0 0 1631764 1796 12840 0 0 0 2 115 57045 4 95 1
> 10 3 0 0 1420616 1796 12840 0 0 0 0 120 55463 5 95 1
> 9 3 0 0 998032 1796 12840 0 0 0 2 111 49490 4 96 1
> VM: killing process bash
> VM: killing process ipctst
> VM: killing process ipctst

hm, IMHO it really does nothing that should make memory balance worse.
Does the stock kernel work even after a long test?

        Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH] int (*readpage)(struct file *, struct page *);"
• Previous message: Christoph Rohland: "Re: [patch] balanced highmem subsystem under pre7-9"
• In reply to: Christoph Rohland: "Re: [patch] balanced highmem subsystem under pre7-9"
• Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [patch] balanced highmem subsystem under pre7-9"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 15 2000 - 21:00:20 EST