> + if (root->start > 0xffffffffUL) {
> + min |= root->start & ~0xffffffffUL;
> + }
+#if BITS_PER_LONG > 32
+ min |= root->start & ~0xffffffffUL;
+#endif
At 64-bit machines we don't need to care about doing some extra
test in case we might not need to use that code, plus at 32-bit
machines it would never execute anyway. Right ?
Ok, I only thought about Alpha.
But having min field in struct resource is a bad thing?
Though the small change affect all the architecure sources,
It doesn't look clean that min value is not related to start or end.
... What's the difference between start and min?
Are those addresses below min ever used?
I don't know, I'm not an architect.
Soohoon.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST