Re: [PATCH] int (*readpage)(struct file *, struct page *);

From: Jeff V. Merkey (jmerkey@timpanogas.com)
Date: Mon May 08 2000 - 14:47:03 EST


I apologize for coming to the party late, but why are we changing this?
Sounds like we might be breaking people's FS code again.

:-)

Jeff

"Roman V. Shaposhnick" wrote:
>
> Linus, Al, and all others,
>
> please take a look at the yet another readpage patch and keep in mind,
> that it tries to do the following:
>
> * all address space operations get a "struct file *" pointer[1]. It will
> contain a hint from kernel when it is available and NULL if it is not.
> E.g.
> 1. inside block_symlink: fs/buffer.c
> 2. "inside" page_getlink: fs/namei.c
>
> * the address space operations should use page->mapping->host to access
> their private address_space data. Thus it won't hurt when we get
> NULL as a first argument.
>
> * the VFS helper functions in fs/buffer.c assume that page->mapping->host
> points to the corresponding inode.
>
> * for network filesystems, or other special fs that don't use
> fs/buffer.c, page->mapping->host can point to arbitrary structures.
>
> Please also note that after this change only two filesystems ( fs/nfs and
> fs/smbfs ) use the first argument of readpage in a non trivial way.
>
> This patch has been successfully applied to pre7-6. All filesystems were
> compiled and several tested.
>
> Finally, I hope, that this time there are no horrible design flaws and the patch
> would be able to creep into pre7-[7|8].
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> [1] I wonder why struct dentry * is needed for a 'writepage' despite of it
> already has struct file * as a first parameter.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> PTCHName: PTCH
> Type: Plain Text (text/plain)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 15 2000 - 21:00:11 EST