Re: devfs persistence

From: Richard Gooch (rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca)
Date: Fri May 05 2000 - 17:37:53 EST


Michael Marxmeier writes:
> Brian Kress wrote:
> > LVM has to run a userspace program vgscan to load the location
> > of the lvm partitions into kernelspace. It does this by scanning
> > EVERY device in /dev for an LVM signature. While I really like LVM,
> ^^^
> Nope. Only block devices.
>
> > this part strikes me as rather unclean. Devfs does help with this
> > a bit, since then at least its not scanning non-existant devices. An
>
> /proc/partitions is used. So again only known block devices are
> scanned.
> And this needs to be done in order to detect pv signature and
> construct the volume groups.
>
> > MD style kernel-based autodetect for LVM would be really nice, but I
> > think Heinz is really busy (since LVM 0.8 for 2.2.x still hasn't
> > shown up).
>
> IMHO there is no need to rush and bloat the kernel.
> It is not too hard to place vgscan/vgchange in the kernel but
> there are other options (like a temporary root block device)
> which should be considered.
> IMHO the initrd aproach should work reasonable for now.

No, we don't want the added complexity of initrd. Anyway, the MD
solution is available.

                                Regards,

                                        Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST