On Fri, 5 May 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> On Fri, 5 May 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
> > Really? That's funny... You mean that something changes if you remove it?
> > Then we are *deep* in it.
>
> the reason that it always failed because of the first check didn't mean it
> would have passed the second check - hence I will need to recheck/retest
> and present a more coherent picture of what's going on - switching back
> and forth between writing nullfs and investigating what may be (not 100%
> proven yet) a VFS bug didn't generate a clear picture yet.
Tigran, could you please give me a reproducible way to get it? I'm sitting and
doing the lightweight-umount thing right now, but I suspect that if I'll have
the sequence that gives the bloody effect I'll find it fast enough.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:17 EST