Re: Should this happen? no, it's a /proc bug

From: Frank van Maarseveen (F.vanMaarseveen@inter.NL.net)
Date: Fri May 05 2000 - 05:09:36 EST

Next message: M Sweger: "Linux v2.2.16pre2, with aicxxx 5.1.29 patch get data overrun for WD drive."
Previous message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Should this happen?"
In reply to: Craig Whitmore: "Should this happen?"
Next in thread: David Ford: "Re: Should this happen? no, it's a /proc bug"
Reply: David Ford: "Re: Should this happen? no, it's a /proc bug"
Reply: Phillip Jones: "Re: Should this happen? no, it's a /proc bug"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 09:35:24AM +1200, Craig Whitmore wrote:
> With 2.3.99-pre6 (haven't checked any other versions)
>
> [root@lennon /proc]# more misc
> Segmentation fault
strace says:
read(3, "135 rtc\n 1 psaux\n", 2) = 18

-- Frank

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: M Sweger: "Linux v2.2.16pre2, with aicxxx 5.1.29 patch get data overrun for WD drive."
Previous message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Should this happen?"
In reply to: Craig Whitmore: "Should this happen?"
Next in thread: David Ford: "Re: Should this happen? no, it's a /proc bug"
Reply: David Ford: "Re: Should this happen? no, it's a /proc bug"
Reply: Phillip Jones: "Re: Should this happen? no, it's a /proc bug"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:17 EST