tytso@valinux.com writes:
> Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 17:20:51 +0100
> From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
>
> Looks like there's a long-standing thinko in the block bitmap caching
> in ext2 in 2.2. The inode bitmap cache looks fine.
>
> Ted, want to ack this? It looks wrong in 2.3 too, btw.
>
> Yup, it's a bug, all right. We're lucky this hasn't caused us problems
> on large filesystems.
Can anyone confirm that this is (or is not) a problem in 2.0 too? The
logic there seems only slightly different (sets slot = 0 and falls
through lower down instead of returning straight away).
--Malcolm
-- Malcolm Beattie <mbeattie@sable.ox.ac.uk> Unix Systems Programmer Oxford University Computing Services- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 07 2000 - 21:00:17 EST