Re: devfs persistence

From: Richard Gooch (rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca)
Date: Thu Apr 27 2000 - 23:20:21 EST


Matthew Jacob writes:
> >
> > > For example lets say that we bring down a machine and durring this
> > > time there is a LIP on our FCAL and two of the drives swap id's,
> > > then on reboot the system thinks the drive that was used for /home
> > > is / and the drive for / is /home
> >
> > What is "LIP"?
>
> Loop Initialization Primitive- it can cause the actual local loop
> address for a device to change- which will then change the 'target'
> id (target is a more virtual concept for FCP-SCSI).

Right.

> > We use labels to solve this.
>
> That's fine insofar as it goes, but if you have a naming schema that
> has a bus address as part of it, if the address can change
> dynamically, that can be an issue. I think that labels are a good
> idea- you end up not caring what address something is at. And UUIDs
> or other device unique information is good solid naming stuff.

Why are you concerned about the naming scheme that depends on bus
addresses? I was talking about specifying labels. How do bus addresses
come into the picture?

                                Regards,

                                        Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 30 2000 - 21:00:14 EST