Re: llseek and 64 bit return...

From: Oliver Xymoron (oxymoron@waste.org)
Date: Mon Apr 24 2000 - 21:59:42 EST

Next message: David Ford: "[bug-pcmcia] machine hangs during boot with linksys cardbus etherfast 10/100 (PCMPC200)"
Previous message: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: "movb" for spin-unlock (was Re: namei() query)"
In reply to: Linda Walsh: "Re: llseek and 64 bit return..."
Next in thread: Linda Walsh: "RE: llseek and 64 bit return..."
Reply: Linda Walsh: "RE: llseek and 64 bit return..."
Reply: Linda Walsh: "RE: llseek and 64 bit return..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 24 Apr 2000, Linda Walsh wrote:

> Matti Aarnio wrote:
> > Use lseek64() and be happy.
>
> Is there some good reason why the interface shouldn't be cleaned up
> on Intel?

Binary compatibility. At the source level, glibc should hide it all for
you with a compile flag.

-- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Ford: "[bug-pcmcia] machine hangs during boot with linksys cardbus etherfast 10/100 (PCMPC200)"
Previous message: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: "movb" for spin-unlock (was Re: namei() query)"
In reply to: Linda Walsh: "Re: llseek and 64 bit return..."
Next in thread: Linda Walsh: "RE: llseek and 64 bit return..."
Reply: Linda Walsh: "RE: llseek and 64 bit return..."
Reply: Linda Walsh: "RE: llseek and 64 bit return..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 30 2000 - 21:00:08 EST