Re: movb lockup - test result (?)

• Next message: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: Testers wanted! (was Re: "movb" for spin-unlock)"
• Previous message: Michael Ivanov: "IDE problems in 2.2.14"
• In reply to: Admin Mailing Lists: "Re: movb lockup - test result (?)"
• Next in thread: Admin Mailing Lists: "Re: movb lockup - test result (?)"
• Reply: Admin Mailing Lists: "Re: movb lockup - test result (?)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 24 Apr 2000, Admin Mailing Lists wrote:

> I have a dual ppro 200 and would like to try out this test for you, but
> what are the consequences? Is there any chances of data corruption? What's
> the expected time to complete the test?

The new test is a simple app that runs with normal priviledges and fails
by exiting, not locking up. Test takes a minute or so on a dual 200.

Currently I have positive results for PPro steppings 9 and 7. I still need
6, 2, and 1. And failure results for any machine are of course very
important.

--
 "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.." 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: Testers wanted! (was Re: "movb" for spin-unlock)"
• Previous message: Michael Ivanov: "IDE problems in 2.2.14"
• In reply to: Admin Mailing Lists: "Re: movb lockup - test result (?)"
• Next in thread: Admin Mailing Lists: "Re: movb lockup - test result (?)"
• Reply: Admin Mailing Lists: "Re: movb lockup - test result (?)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 30 2000 - 21:00:07 EST