On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 09:08:13PM +0100, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> well, the trick is (or I thought it was) that in the above you assumed the
> sequence of modifying sys_call_table[] atomic. It is true on ia32 but
> Linux supports a lot more archs than just ia32 so I don't know if that's
> true on all architectures.
Agreed. This whole sys_cal_table thing is arch specific, anyway. I
remember Ralf Baechle saying that nobody thought of updating
sys_narg_table on MIPS...
Regards,
Borislav
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:18 EST