Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs

From: allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
Date: Sat Apr 15 2000 - 07:18:17 EST


On 15 Apr, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
+-----
| It may be better to give group IDs flag bits. One could get
| Netware-style trustees almost for free by using a flag bit to
| distinguish UID and GID values. Other flag bits could specify:
| can setgid(), can chown(), can gain access, can lose access,
| can use for killing processes, etc.
+--->8

You've just reinvented capabilities.

-- 
brandon s. allbery	   os/2,linux,solaris,perl	allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator	   kthkrb,heimdal,gnome,rt	  allbery@ece.cmu.edu
carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering			kf8nh
    We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:26 EST