On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Ted Sikora wrote:
> Andre Hedrick wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Ted Sikora wrote:
> > > hda:hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
> > > hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
> > > hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
> > > hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
> > > hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
> > > hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
> > > hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
> > > hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
> > > hda: DMA disabled
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > 2.2.14-pre15 is fine with ide patch
> >
> > Do you mean "ide.2.2.15-14.20000325.patch"?
> ide.2.2.15-15.20000317.patch.bz2
> >
> > Did you enable "CONFIG_WDC_ALI15X3" without reading the "FOOLS Warning"?
> >
> No...it's diasabled. I saw (DANGEROUS)and heeded the warning.
Excellent........
> It was working fine up until now. Previous 2.3 kernels have been problem
> free except under fsck for quite awhile. My Maxtor/IBM drives have never
> produced errors and are very fast with the patches. Strangely they seem
> better under UDMA33 rather than UDMA66.
This makes sense, because there are no options that allow for native
functionality of UDMA66.
Andre Hedrick
The Linux ATA/IDE guy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:27 EST