On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Bryan -TheBS- Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> > Perhaps we need another tunable parameter (max fs cache) or something
> > like that?
>
> Now that I found the doc I was looking for (thanx everyone -- again,
> JUST SHOOT ME because I looked there and missed it before!), how
> would this "max fs cache" parameter differ from what is or has been
> reserved for in the docs:
>
> > buffermem:
[SNIPPED...]
Shoot me also. I didn't know that these parameters even existed!
I'll hack around with them and see if I can get rid of the flush daemon.
Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.3.41 on an i686 machine (800.63 BogoMips).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:25 EST