Re: eepro100 driver update

From: James Fidell (james@cloud9.co.uk)
Date: Mon Mar 27 2000 - 17:35:26 EST

Next message: Ted Sikora: "Re: shmget() failed, fix?"
Previous message: Dave Jones: "Oops in ide code on 2.3.99pre3"
In reply to: Andrey Savochkin: "eepro100 driver update"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: eepro100 driver update"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: eepro100 driver update"
Reply: Andrey Savochkin: "Re: eepro100 driver update"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Quoting Andrey Savochkin (saw@saw.sw.com.sg):

> I've prepared eepro100 driver update for 2.3/4 kernels.

This:

> +#ifdef MODULE
> +static int debug = -1; /* The debug level */
> +#endif

Seems to be incompatible with this:

> static int __init eepro100_init_module(void)
> {
> + if (debug >= 0 && speedo_debug != debug)
> + printk(KERN_INFO "eepro100.c: Debug level is %d.\n", debug);
> if (debug >= 0)
> speedo_debug = debug;

in that it prevents static compilation...

James.

-- "Yield to temptation -- | Consultancy: james@cloud9.co.uk it may not pass your way again" | http://www.cloud9.co.uk/james | - Lazarus Long | James Fidell

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ted Sikora: "Re: shmget() failed, fix?"
Previous message: Dave Jones: "Oops in ide code on 2.3.99pre3"
In reply to: Andrey Savochkin: "eepro100 driver update"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: eepro100 driver update"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: eepro100 driver update"
Reply: Andrey Savochkin: "Re: eepro100 driver update"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:21 EST