Re: [RFT] balancing patch

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Mon Mar 27 2000 - 10:50:17 EST


On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Mark Hahn wrote:

> > see whether it helps them. If you try the patch, and see that it
> > helps, or hinders, your system performance, please let me know.
>
> doesn't help: kswapd still wastes major CPU.

I'm now testing Kanoj' balancing patch together with my kswapd
infinite-loop-removal patch. The system seems to work quite well,
I haven't seen any big strangeness in the VM load (the variance
in the amount of free memory is a bit bigger, naturally, but that's
to be expected) and interactive performance from the console seems
unaffected.

It would be nice if a few more people tested the combination of
2.3.99-pre3 with Kanoj' balancing patch and my infinite-loop-
removal patch ... (because YMMV)

regards,

Rik

--
The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network
of people. That is its real strength.

Wanna talk about the kernel? irc.openprojects.net / #kernelnewbies http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:20 EST