Re: [RFT] balancing patch

From: Mark Hahn (hahn@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca)
Date: Mon Mar 27 2000 - 07:56:43 EST

Next message: Lyle Seaman: "Re: Fake SCSI devices"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: __setup return value"
In reply to: Kanoj Sarcar: "[RFT] balancing patch"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: [RFT] balancing patch"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: [RFT] balancing patch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> see whether it helps them. If you try the patch, and see that it
> helps, or hinders, your system performance, please let me know.

doesn't help: kswapd still wastes major CPU.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Lyle Seaman: "Re: Fake SCSI devices"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: __setup return value"
In reply to: Kanoj Sarcar: "[RFT] balancing patch"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: [RFT] balancing patch"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: [RFT] balancing patch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:19 EST