On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>
> > Before slaming someone, take a moment to look at the patch.
>
> You bet that I did.
I'm sorry for coming off so strongly.
[snip]
> > They removed the VFS bastardazation. :)
>
> Yeah, except that if you will look intofs/reiserfs you will see a lot of
> code that was obviously unmaintained for a year or so. And interating with
> VFS.
>
> In other words, if "Nobody cares if reiserfs is totally out of sync with
> VFS" is a valid position - fine. But then I'ld like to have that statement
> written and signed in blood. By Hans and his team. I don't think that
> such position is valid for anything included into the tree. Moreover, it
> pretty much makes inclusion into the tree meaningless.
Try to be easier on them. I certantly couldn't design a sophisticated tree
based file system, mange users, fix bugs, AND track the Linux kernel API
at the same time. :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:00:23 EST