On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Before slaming someone, take a moment to look at the patch.
You bet that I did.
> When I looked the other day (please excuse memory fuzz), there was only
> ONE small, veryfiable patch made outside of the reiserfs directory
> excluding includes, makefile, and menu garbage.
>
> They removed the VFS bastardazation. :)
Yeah, except that if you will look intofs/reiserfs you will see a lot of
code that was obviously unmaintained for a year or so. And interating with
VFS.
In other words, if "Nobody cares if reiserfs is totally out of sync with
VFS" is a valid position - fine. But then I'ld like to have that statement
written and signed in blood. By Hans and his team. I don't think that
such position is valid for anything included into the tree. Moreover, it
pretty much makes inclusion into the tree meaningless.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:00:23 EST