> Why ? Why to introduce additional level of indirection and such if you can not
> introduce new policy anyway (it's defined in "Linux Allocated Devices"
> document as you said earlier :-)
The policy should be in user space but the default policy should be back
compatibility. I'd have expected devfs to do that by default unless told not
to.. as it happens devfsd does it by default if you run it.. which I guess
isnt far off
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:00:21 EST