Re: Linux 64 bit for x86 has UDI support?

From: Christoph Hellwig (chhellwig@gmx.net)
Date: Tue Mar 07 2000 - 12:49:17 EST

Next message: Sergey Kubushin: "2.2.15pre13 fails to compile in smbfs (was i2o)"
Previous message: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: Changes in the sockets: SIGIO handling"
In reply to: diep doan: "Re: Linux 64 bit for x86 has UDI support?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 64 bit for x86 has UDI support?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 09:10:02AM -0800, diep doan wrote:
> Anybody knows Linux64 bit for Intel arhitecture has
> UDI (Uniform Driver Interface) supported? Trillium has
^^^^^^^^
There is no Linux Version code named Trillium.
UDI is a shit binary interface. At this time no one
is really interested in it ...

Christoph Hellwig

-- Always remember that you are unique. Just like everyone else.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Sergey Kubushin: "2.2.15pre13 fails to compile in smbfs (was i2o)"
Previous message: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: Changes in the sockets: SIGIO handling"
In reply to: diep doan: "Re: Linux 64 bit for x86 has UDI support?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 64 bit for x86 has UDI support?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:23 EST