Re: [OT] fpu IRQ x86-ism

From: Riley Williams (rhw@MemAlpha.cx)
Date: Mon Mar 06 2000 - 20:09:27 EST


Hi Peter.

>> Sorry for this somewhat OT question - I'll try to be brief.
>> I have always noticed that on x86 Linux boxes, IRQ 13 is
>> for the FPU and is always "1" (I assume this is from
>> probing or testing at bootup). This value never seems to
>> change, so again I will assume that it is only used to
>> signal FPU errors. There is no "fpu IRQ" on my Alpha,
>> obviously it has an FPU as well. Is it's existance on the
>> PC just some lame legacy issue?

> Yup. It isn't even used to signal FPU errors on 486+ PCs.

Does that mean it's available for use by other hardware, or is
that prohibited by other considerations?

Best wishes from Riley.

 * Copyright (C) 2000, Memory Alpha Systems.
 * All rights and wrongs reserved.

+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
| development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
| in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
| else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
 * http://www.memalpha.cx/Linux/Kernel/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:21 EST