Re: [OT] fpu IRQ x86-ism

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
Date: Mon Mar 06 2000 - 15:08:23 EST


Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003061109520.12766-100000@neptune.terran>
By author: "B. James Phillippe" <bryan@terran.org>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Greetings,
>
> Sorry for this somewhat OT question - I'll try to be brief. I have always
> noticed that on x86 Linux boxes, IRQ 13 is for the FPU and is always "1" (I
> assume this is from probing or testing at bootup). This value never seems
> to change, so again I will assume that it is only used to signal FPU
> errors. There is no "fpu IRQ" on my Alpha, obviously it has an FPU as
> well. Is it's existance on the PC just some lame legacy issue?
>

Yup. It isn't even used to signal FPU errors on 486+ PCs.

        -hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:20 EST