Re: new IRQ scalability changes in 2.3.48

From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu)
Date: Fri Mar 03 2000 - 06:15:15 EST


On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> Agreed ;). OTOH there's a minor pros with such SMP irq design that we are
> forced to use: we kill irq latency best. IO-APIC AFIK chooses the CPU that
> is handling the lower bus load at irq time, but it doesn't choose the CPU
> that has irq enabled AFIK.

incorrect, it does.

> "From all processors listed in the destination, the processor
> selected is the one whose current arbitration priority is the
> lowest."

check out the 'focus CPU' feature.

-- mingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 21:00:14 EST