Hi Trond,
On 8 Feb 2000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Stability seems very good. The kernel passed both 'iozone' and the
> 'make -j8 bzImage' tests over NFSv3 with flying colours. I haven't
> tried out the large file support, although the patches include support
> for >2Gb files under NFSv3. There are also patches included for >2Gb
> NLM4 locking support.
This is all very good news, and I have one extra piece to add to the
announcement: we just finished adding NFSv3 support for linux into
am-utils (the Berkeley automounter), based on these patches. It will
appear in the next snapshot, 6.0.4s1, to be released shortly.
> http://www.fys.uio.no/~trondmy/src/linux-2.3.42-nfsv3.dif.bz2
One question though: what's the difference between the "nfsv2" and "nfsv3"
patches on your site? The v2 changes seem to be a superset of the v3
changes, but is that really the case?
Thanks,
Ion
--
It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
than to open it and remove all doubt.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 21:00:14 EST