On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Jeffrey B. Siegal wrote:
> I don't believe so. They can put their proprietary parts under any license
> they want, but they can't apply this license to the GPL parts. If this is
> what they're doing (which seems plausible), their press release is deceptive
> because it claims that the entire product is "not for resale," not that just
> the proprietary parts are not for resale. Clearly the GPL'ed parts (which
> makes up virtually all of the product, I'm confident) *can* be resold.
Furthermore, It would be even harder to believe that they would have a
bunch of propritary parts in the result to charge royalties without having
kernel mods.
Speaking of kernel mods, has anyone taken a look at the beta checkpoint
for Linux?
They don't need to patch the kernel, so I guess it's okay with Linuses
broken version of the GPL....
How do you check if they are including kernel headers?
:)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 21:00:28 EST