Re: kernel panics at google

From: yoann@mandrakesoft.com
Date: Tue Jan 25 2000 - 20:09:19 EST


David desJardins <desj@google.com> writes:

> yoann@mandrakesoft.com writes:
> > Maybe giving a trace of the kind of packet received before the crash
> > could help understanding / tracing the problem...
> >
> > tcpdump -s2000 -vvv -w outfile
> > ( make sure no private data are passing on the network ).
>
> I'm afraid this really isn't practical. Each webserver handles well
> over 100 requests/second at peak times, and goes days between crashes.
> It also communicates with hundreds of different servers. We can't
> possibly tcpdump every single packet, even in the most skeletal form,
> and even if the webservers didn't have other work to do.
I know that,
but it is probably the most easy way to find the problem :-(

>
> > Also, you should modify tcpdump call fflush() after each
> > line it append to the file.
>
> And flushing after every line would be even more expensive.
Clearly...

-- 
		-- Yoann http://www.security-addict.org
 It is well known that M$ product don't make a free() after a malloc(),
the unix community wish them good luck for their future developement.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 21:00:16 EST