Re: Towards non-recursive makefiles

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Mon Jan 24 2000 - 10:17:45 EST


Hi!

> > : I've long believed that one big-ass Makefile was needed for the kernel
> >
> > Count my vote for this as well. I know both ways have their drawbacks,
> > but the limiting factor in how far you can scale things in parallel
> > rather quickly becomes make itself. If everything is in one makefile,
> > it tends to work a lot better.
>
> Not to mention that make -j can do its thing properly...
>
> Call me a slacker, but I only managed to get drivers/scsi done last night
> before going to sleep. The good news is that it went from 671 lines to
> 140 using the list trick (and some rationalisation and dead code
> removal).

Be sure to feed it to linus in small pieces. In one-per-directory
speed, he is likely to accept such patches (he already did for
drivers/usb)...
                                                                Pavel

-- 
The best software in life is free (not shareware)!		Pavel
GCM d? s-: !g p?:+ au- a--@ w+ v- C++@ UL+++ L++ N++ E++ W--- M- Y- R+

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 21:00:12 EST