Its actually meant to be buildable under g++ currently. Thats why we don't
have variables called new or lines like
v=8//**/
-4;
> alone should be more than enough reason to periodically compile the
> kernel w/ g++ to make sure there aren't any subtle type errors. In a
Yes. Although gcc -Wall -pedantic is a pretty good checker for most
things.
> good safety measure. There's even a chance it could improve some code
> by pointing out which parameters weren't used in a function. While it
> doesn't guarantee good code, it does prevent sloppy code from causing
> problems.
No arguments.